conformity, -I
CONFORMITY,-I; cf. The ratio between smth., expressing consistency, equality in smth. respect. C. production relations character of the productive forces. Complete with. interests. Violated with. between parts of the building. C. between the color of the animal and the color of the environment. C. form and content. Find the words of the original with. in the target language. In accordance with how. in sign pretext. According to the plan, according to the schedule.
CONFORMITY to what / between what / with what. Correspondence of production relations with the nature of the productive forces; Nikolai Petrovich has much more correspondence and harmony between his mental convictions and natural inclinations than Arkady(D.P.); The command of the Southern Front developed, in accordance with the instructions of the commander-in-chief, a counteroffensive plan(Fed.).
the search word is missing
the search word is missing
Synonyms: quick reference
the search word is missing
HARMONY - DISHARMONY
Harmonious - disharmonious
harmony - disharmony
to harmonize - to harmonize
[The writer] gains experience, becomes a master, comprehends the laws of composition, architectonics, harmony and disharmony, enriches himself with a whole arsenal of means and professional secrets. V. Soloukhin. Autumn leaves. A musical chord in all ... [people with a normally developed ear] will inevitably and necessarily cause a feeling of harmony, and dissonance a feeling of disharmony. L. Tkachev. Selected literary-critical articles. A sense of style helps us understand life, its harmony and disharmony, people's relationships. A. Elchaninov. Entries. There is not enough strength for harmony - he [the poet] builds his world as disharmony. L. Anninsky. Andrei Voznesensky.
LAD - DISORDER
A good life is permeated by harmony, mood, rhythm, consistency in variety. And vice versa, a bad life is discord, chaos, turmoil, failure, absurdity ... It is not by chance that the book is called “Lad” and tells about the harmony, and not about the discord of peasant life. V. Belov. Lad.
HARMONY - DISSOLUTION
Deeds good and evil, cruel and generous, the freedom of the spirit and its slavery, discord and harmony, as I perceive them with a simple feeling - that's what interests me. Chaliapin. Mask and soul. Harmony, both spiritual and physical separately, and in general, is life, the fullness of life, rhythm. Breaking the rhythm is discord, illness, disorder, disorder. V. Belov. Lad.
COMPLIANCE - NON-COMPLIANCE
The circle closed characters came into final mutual conformity, or rather, into final inconsistency, incompatibility, complete impossibility of coexistence. Y. Karabchievsky. Pain point.
In line or in line: it's all about meaning
“Tell me, how would you write in the phrase “according to ...)“ and ”or“ e ”?
This question sometimes arises even among people who know well the laws of spelling.
What to do, how to write in accordance or in accordance? Let's figure it out.
What the rules say
To answer this simple question in a nutshell, we can say briefly - these are two different contents, meanings. And therefore their spelling is different, it is not the same - in one situation, “e” is written at the end, and in another - “and”. Since there are clear rules of the Russian language, then these 2 expressions will be written as the meaning of each of them dictates. In order to write them correctly in texts, it is necessary to determine the speech situations where they are appropriate.
What do the words mean
Lexically, the word correspondence, corresponding, etc. means a relationship between something, expressing consistency in some characteristics, that is, speech: about a place, about time, etc.
When we write "according"
The expression "in accordance" is written in cases where the action must coincide with one or another requirement, for example, for behavior, or a person makes a decision, or must perform some action.
Example
Life according to the monastic rules is not easy.
The commission decided to inspect the pipeline according to the opinion of each member.
The expression "in accordance" is an adverbial preposition formed from the word "correspondence".
It is used in sentences as a service part of speech, despite the partial
preservation of circumstance.
Example
Arriving at a strange house, behave in accordance with the rules established in it (question: how to behave? And answer: in accordance with the established rules.)
The sailors acted in accordance with the instructions of the met services (question: how did they act? - answer: in accordance with the instructions)
When we write "in line"
The expression "in line" implies bringing to a standard, correcting, making better
something that must satisfy certain stable norms of a general order.
Example
Aligning your needs with your abilities will save you from living at the expense of others.
Having brought the case in line with the instructions, the master was able to report without problems.
That is, if we talk about morphological features, then this is a noun with a preposition in
accusative case. "E" is written at the end of the word, because the form of this case of the word "correspondence" coincides with the form of the nominative.
As for the syntactic role of the prepositional-nominal combination, it is direct
addition.
Summary
- An expression with the ending "e", consisting of a noun and a preposition, plays the role of an object(it is necessary to bring something “in line”; includes a definition to a noun:
- An expression with "and" is an adverbial preposition that somehow retained the adverbial meaning(he indicates the ratio of actions; an indivisible whole into which you cannot introduce an additional
The expressions “in accordance” and “in accordance” differ in meaning: their spelling depends on this. In order to avoid mistakes in choosing the ending of the word “correspondence”, it is necessary to understand in what speech situations its use is appropriate.
The lexical series "correspondence", "corresponding", "corresponding" has the general meaning of the relationship between something, expressing consistency in certain characteristics, coincidence in time, place or other signs.
The expression "in accordance" is used when it comes to an action that must coincide with certain requirements for behavior, decision-making, and the performance of any functions.
He acted in accordance with the order, and his conscience did not torment him.
It is easy to live in accordance with generally accepted norms, but it is impossible to act according to established rules.
The decision to go to the sea was taken in accordance with the opinion of all family members.
"In accordance" is an adverbial preposition derived from the noun "correspondence". In the sentence, it is used as a service part of speech, although it partially retains the adverbial meaning.
In a decent society, it is customary to behave in accordance with the rules of etiquette. (How? - in accordance with the rules.)
The actions of rescuers were coordinated from the center in accordance with meteorological conditions. (How? - in accordance with the conditions.)
The expression "in line" implies the need to bring to a certain standard, correct, improve something that must comply with any stable requirements of the general order.
If you bring your own needs into line with your capabilities, there will be no desire to receive pleasure at the expense of others.
The cases had to be brought into line with the safety instructions.
According to morphological features, “in line” is the accusative case of a noun with a preposition. The spelling -e at the end is explained by the fact that the form of the accusative case of the noun corresponds to the form of the nominative case.
The syntactic role of the prepositional-nominal combination "in accordance" is a direct object.
TheDifference.ru determined that the difference between the combinations "in accordance" and "in accordance" is as follows:
The combination "in accordance" consists of a noun and a preposition, in the sentence it acts as an object. “According to” is an adverbial preposition that partially retains the adverbial meaning.
If we are talking about the need to bring something “in line” with some standard, a noun with a preposition is used. The adverbial preposition "in accordance" indicates the ratio of any actions.
The combination "to match" may include a definition for the noun: "come into full compliance." The adverbial preposition "according to" is an indivisible whole, it is impossible to introduce additional language elements into it.
GUIDELINES
ON LEGAL AND TECHNICAL FORMULATION OF BILLS
Prepared by:
Main State Legal Department of the President of the Russian Federation,
Legal Department of the Office of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation,
Legal Department of the Office of the Government of the Russian Federation,
Legal Department of the Office of the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation,
Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation
MOSCOW
2003
GUIDELINES
on legal and technical execution of bills
The methodological recommendations are designed for the practical application by the subjects of the right of legislative initiative in the course of drafting work, work on amending legislative acts, and preparing lists of legislative acts to be recognized as invalid.
STRUCTURE OF THE BILL
1. Name of the bill reflects its content and the main subject of legal regulation. The name should be accurate, clear and as informative as possible, correctly reflect the subject of legal regulation so that the performers can determine its main content by the name of the legislative act, it is easy to remember, if necessary, quickly find.
Legislative acts with complex and unreasonably long titles clutter up legislation, make it difficult to systematize and understand legislative acts. They are especially inconvenient when referring to them in other regulatory legal acts, acts of application of law, documents, articles, etc.
2. Preamble (introduction)- an independent part of the bill, which defines its goals and objectives, but is not mandatory.
Preamble:
- does not contain independent normative prescriptions;
- not divided into articles;
- does not contain references to other legislative acts to be recognized as invalid and changed in connection with the issuance of a legislative act;
- does not contain legal definitions;
- does not formulate the subject of regulation of the bill;
- not numbered.
The preamble precedes the text of the bill.
Structural units of a bill cannot have a preamble.
3. The division of the bill into structural units simplifies its use, improves its internal construction and systematization, the implementation of references, and helps to quickly navigate the normative material.
The following structural units of legislative acts are used in descending order:
- chapter;
- chapter;
- article.
The structural unit "section" should not be introduced if there are no chapters in the bill.
It is possible to divide large systematized bills (for example, draft codes) into parts, sections into subsections, chapters into paragraphs.
4. Part of the bill:
denoted by the words:
PART ONE;
PART TWO
may be named:
PART ONE
GENERAL PROVISIONS
or denoted (in codes) as follows:
A COMMON PART;
SPECIAL PART
The designation and title of the part of the bill are printed in capital letters in the center of the page, one under the other.
The name of the part of the bill is printed in bold type.
5. Section:
- has a name.
The designation and title of the section are printed in capital letters in the center of the page, one under the other.
The title of the section is printed in bold.
Example:
OWNERSHIP AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS
6. Subsection:
- has a serial number, denoted by Roman numerals;
- has a name.
The subsection designation is printed with a capital letter and a paragraph indent.
The name of the subsection is printed with a capital letter in bold on one line with the designation of the subsection number followed by a dot.
Example:
Subsection I. General Provisions on Obligations
7. Chapter:
- numbered with Arabic numerals;
- has a name.
The chapter designation is printed with a capital letter and a paragraph indent.
The title of the chapter is printed with a capital letter in bold on one line with the designation of the chapter number followed by a dot.
Example:
Chapter 5. Rights, duties and responsibilities in the field of fire safety
8. Paragraph:
- marked with a sign;
- has a name.
The name of the paragraph is printed with a capital letter in bold on one line with the designation of the paragraph number, followed by a period.
Example:
1. Business partnerships and companies
9. Article of the bill:
- is its main structural unit;
- has a serial number denoted by Arabic numerals;
- has a name, but in exceptional cases may not have it:
Examples:
Article 33. Certification
one. :::::::. . (part 1)
2. :::::::. . (part 2)
one. ::::::.. . (part 1)
2. ::::::.. . (part 2)
The designation of the article is printed with a capital letter and a paragraph indent.
The name of the article is printed with a capital letter in bold on one line with the designation of the article number, followed by a period.
If the article does not have a title, then the dot after the article number is not put and the article designation is printed with a capital letter and a paragraph indent in bold.
The article is divided into parts.
Parts of the article are indicated by an Arabic numeral with a dot.
Parts of the articles are subdivided into paragraphs, denoted by Arabic numerals with a closing parenthesis.
Items are divided into sub-items, denoted by lowercase letters of the Russian alphabet with a closing parenthesis.
Examples:
Article 33. Certification
one. :::::::. . (part 1)
2. :::::::: (part 2)
one) ::::::.; (paragraph 1 of part 2)
2) ::::::.: (clause 2 of part 2)
a):::::: ; (subparagraph "a" of paragraph 2 of part 2)
b) :::::: . (subparagraph "b" of paragraph 2 of part 2)
one. ::::::.. . (part 1)
2. ::::::..: (part 2)
one) ::::::. ; (paragraph 1 of part 2)
2) ::::::. : (item 2 of part 2)
a):::::::; (subparagraph "a" of paragraph 2 of part 2)
b) ::::::. . (subparagraph "b" of paragraph 2 of part 2)
In exceptional cases, parts, paragraphs and subparagraphs of an article may be divided into paragraphs (no more than five). The limitation on the number of possible paragraphs does not apply to articles containing lists of the main concepts used in the draft law.
The division of parts in an article or parts in different articles of the same draft law into paragraphs and paragraphs that will follow a colon in the text of the parts is not allowed.
The division of paragraphs in parts of an article or in different articles of the same bill into subparagraphs and into paragraphs that will follow a colon in the text of the paragraph is not allowed.
Examples of possible options for the structure of parts of the article:
3. The following shall be attached to the decision to apply to the meeting of creditors: (paragraph one of part 3)
financial recovery plan; (paragraph of the second part 3)
debt repayment schedule; (paragraph three of part 3)
other documents provided for by this Federal Law. (paragraph four of part 3)
Article 1. Procedure for Considering Creditors' Claims
1. If there are objections to creditors' claims court of Arbitration checks the validity of the claims. (part 1)
2. Claims of creditors are considered at a session of an arbitration court. Based on the results of the consideration, a ruling is issued to include or refuse to include the specified claims in the register of creditor claims. (part 2)
3. The Federal Arbitration Court operates as part of: (paragraph one of part 3)
1) presidium; (paragraph 1 of part 3)
2) judicial board: (clause 2 of part 3)
a) to resolve disputes arising from civil legal relations; (subparagraph "a" of paragraph 2 of part 3)
b) to resolve disputes arising from administrative legal relations. (subparagraph "b" of paragraph 2 of part 3)
10. Draft laws on the ratification of international treaties of the Russian Federation, which do not contain any other regulatory requirements, are drawn up as follows:
Examples:
On ratification of the Convention between the Russian Federation and the Kingdom of Norway for the Avoidance of Double Taxation
Ratify the Convention between the Russian Federation and the Kingdom of Norway for the avoidance of double taxation, signed in Oslo on March 26, 1996, with the following statement:
the term "Svalbard" refers to the Svalbard archipelago over which the Kingdom of Norway has sovereignty by virtue of the Svalbard Treaty of 9 February 1920.
On ratification of the Convention between the Russian Federation and the Kingdom of Norway for the Avoidance of Double Taxation
Ratify the Convention between the Russian Federation and the Kingdom of Norway for the avoidance of double taxation, signed in Oslo on March 26, 1996, with the following reservations:
1) when applying: proceed from the following: (clause 1 of the Federal Law)
a) in relation to persons who are members of: (subparagraph "a" of paragraph 1)
b) the requesting Party:; (subparagraph "b" of paragraph 1)
2) The Russian Federation reserves the right to: . (point 2)
If a bill on the ratification of international treaties of the Russian Federation includes the ratification of several international treaties or contains provisions on the procedure for its entry into force, then such a bill is drawn up in accordance with the general rules applicable to draft laws containing untitled articles.
Examples:
On the ratification of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts,
directed against the safety of maritime navigation,
and the Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts,
directed against the safety of stationary
platforms located on the continental shelfRatify the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, signed at London on March 2, 1989, with the following reservation:
The Russian Federation applies paragraph 1 of Article 8 of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, to the extent that it does not contradict its legislation.
Ratify the Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Located on the Continental Shelf, signed in London on March 2, 1989.
On ratification of the Convention between the Russian Federation and the Kingdom of Norway for the Avoidance of Double Taxation
Ratify the Convention between the Russian Federation and the Kingdom of Norway for the avoidance of double taxation, signed in Oslo on March 26, 1996.
The name of the international treaty of the Russian Federation in the draft law on ratification must be completely identical to the name of this international treaty in the signed original. No changes are allowed.
11. Draft laws on amendments to legislative acts, as well as draft laws containing lists of legislative acts recognized as invalid, have a special article structure. Such bills:
- do not have article titles;
- are divided into paragraphs numbered in Arabic numerals with a closing parenthesis, or into paragraphs that do not have symbols.
Items can be divided into sub-items, denoted by lowercase letters of the Russian alphabet with a closing parenthesis.
one):::::::..; (paragraph 1)
2):::::::. ; (point 2)
3):::::::..: (item 3)
a) :::::::..; (subparagraph "a" of paragraph 3)
b) :::::::..; (subparagraph "b" of paragraph 3)
four):::::::. . (point 4)
Include in the Federal Law dated::::::.. No.: "On:::." (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, :., No:, Art.:.) the following changes:
:::::::..; (second paragraph)
:::::::. ; (third paragraph)
:::::::..; (paragraph four)
:::::::. . (fifth paragraph)
Recognize invalid:
one):::::::..; (paragraph 1)
2):::::::. ; (point 2)
3):::::::..; (point 3)
four):::::::..; (point 4)
5) :::::::..; (point 5)
6):::::::. . (point 6)
Recognize invalid:
:::::::..; (second paragraph)
:::::::. ; (third paragraph)
:::::::.. . (paragraph four)
12. The numbering of articles, chapters, sections and other structural units of the draft law must be continuous. For example, separate numbering of articles of each chapter or separate numbering of chapters of each section is not allowed.
It is unacceptable to change the numbering of parts, sections, chapters, articles of a legislative act when making changes to it and recognizing the structural units of the legislative act as invalid.
It is unacceptable to change the numbering of parts of articles, paragraphs and the letter designation of subparagraphs of parts of articles of a legislative act when changes are made to it and the structural units of an article of a legislative act are declared invalid.
If additions are made at the end of the legislative act, then it is necessary to continue the existing numbering of parts, sections, chapters, articles (for example, the last was chapter 5 - add chapter 6; the last was article 7 - add article 8).
If additions are made to the end of the structural unit of the article, then it is also necessary to continue the existing numbering (for example, in the article the last part was part 3 - add part 4; in the part the last paragraph was paragraph 3 - add paragraph 4, etc.).
If the legislative act is supplemented by new structural units, then the new structural units must be additionally indicated by numbers placed above the main numerical or alphabetic designations (for example, Chapter 51, Article 72, Part 21, Clause 33, Subparagraph "b1").
Example:
Include in the Federal Law dated::::::.. No.: "On:::." (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, :., No:, Art.:.) the following changes:
1) supplement Article 151 with the following content:
"Article 151. ::::::.
2. :::::::.. .";
2) in Article 16:
Part 2 shall be supplemented with paragraph 21 of the following content:
"21) ::::::::::.;";
paragraph 3 of part 4 shall be supplemented with subparagraph "b2" of the following content:
"b2) :::::::::..;".
13. In the articles on the entry into force of bills the term "entry into force" should be used.
An article on the procedure for entry into force is introduced in draft laws if it is necessary to establish a special procedure for the entry into force of this legislative act, different from that determined by Federal Law No. 5-FZ of June 14, 1994 "On the procedure for publishing and entry into force of federal constitutional laws federal laws, acts of the chambers of the Federal Assembly.
Examples:
This Federal Law shall enter into force upon expiration of 30 days from the date of its official publication.
This Federal Law shall enter into force on the day of its official publication.
14. The concept of "implementation" used only in relation to codes. An independent federal law on enactment is adopted only in respect of codes.
15. It is advisable to avoid inclusion in the bill notes to articles, chapters, sections, parts or the bill as a whole. Such provisions must be formulated as independent articles or included directly in the text of the structural unit to which they refer.
16. Bills may have appendices, which contain various kinds of lists, tables, graphs, tariffs, maps, samples of forms, documents, diagrams, etc.
If there are several annexes to the bill, they are numbered in Arabic numerals without indicating the sign No. When referring to annexes in the text of the bill, the sign number is also not indicated.
Example:
in accordance with Appendix 4 to the Federal Law
The legal force of the appendices and the legislative act to which they refer is the same.
The designation of the application is located in the upper right corner of the page after the text of the bill without indicating the registration number and the date of signing the legislative act.
Application
to the Federal Law "On:::"
Appendix 2
to the Federal Law "On:::"
The name of the application is located in the center of the page.
HOW TO USE LINKS
19. If it is necessary to make a reference in the draft law to a legislative act, the following details shall be indicated in the following sequence: type of legislative act, date of its signing, registration number and name of the legislative act.
Examples:
are regulated by the Federal Constitutional Law of October 10, 1995 No. 2-FKZ "On the Referendum of the Russian Federation"
in accordance with the Decree of the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation of August 20, 1993 No. 5664-I "On the Enactment of the Law of the Russian Federation "On Space Activities"
In the absence of a number of a legislative act, its type, date of signing and name of the legislative act shall be indicated.
Example:
The type of a specific legislative act is indicated with a capital letter.
Example:
in accordance with the Federal Law of July 11, 2001 No. 95-FZ "On Political Parties" (hereinafter - the Federal Law "On Political Parties")
21. When referring to a legislative act, which was completely set out in a new edition, its details are indicated in the following sequence: the type of legislative act and its name, and in parentheses are indicated the type of legislative act, the date of signing and the registration number of the legislative act that completely set out this legislative act in a new edition.
Example:
in accordance with the Law of the Russian Federation "On Subsoil" (as amended by the Federal Law of March 3, 1995 No. 27-FZ)
Example:
in accordance with Part 1 of Article 5 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation
Examples:
regulated by the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation
in the manner prescribed by the Customs Code of the Russian Federation
in accordance with part two of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation
Example:
regulated by Article 321 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation
in the manner prescribed by Article 20 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation
in accordance with Article 924 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation
Example:
are regulated by clause 4 of part 2 of article 10 of the Federal Law dated::: No.: "::::"
26. Designations of sections, chapters, articles, parts, paragraphs are printed in numbers, subparagraph designations are printed in lowercase letters of the Russian alphabet in quotation marks.
Examples:
subparagraph "a2" of paragraph 2 of part 1 of Article 5
subparagraph "c" of paragraph 1 of part 2 of Article 5sections III and IV
Examples:
paragraph two of part 1 of article 1
in accordance with the first paragraph of part 1 of Article 1
In this case, the first paragraph is considered to be the paragraph from which the structural unit begins, in which it is located.
Example:
Article 33. Certification
1. :::::: (paragraph one of part 1)
:::; (paragraph of the second part 1)
:::; (paragraph three of part 1)
::: . (paragraph four of part 1)
2. :::::: . (part 2)
Examples:
in connection with the provisions of this chapter
in accordance with part 1 of article 5 of this Code
in accordance with Part 32 of Article 5 of this Federal Law
in accordance with clause 1 of part 1 of this article
in accordance with Clause 21 of Part 4 of Article 5 of this Federal Law
in accordance with subparagraph "a1" of paragraph 2 of part 3 of Article 5 of this Federal Law
regulated by subparagraph "b" of paragraph 2 of part 3 of Article 5 of this Federal Law
29. References in legislative acts may be given to legislative acts of higher or equal legal force. References to specific normative legal acts of lower legal force or their individual structural units are not allowed (for example, a reference in a legislative act to a specific resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation).
30. References to normative instructions of other legislative acts are not allowed in the text of the draft law., which in turn are referential.
31. Sources of official publication of laws of the RSFSR, resolutions of the Congress of People's Deputies of the RSFSR, resolutions of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR, decrees and resolutions of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR were Bulletin of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR, Bulletin of the Congress of People's Deputies of the RSFSR and the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR and the newspaper "Soviet Russia".
The sources of the official publication of the laws of the Russian Federation, resolutions of the Congress of People's Deputies of the Russian Federation, resolutions of the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Federation and resolutions of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Federation were Vedomosti of the Congress of People's Deputies of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Federation and Rossiyskaya Gazeta.
32. If amendments are made to a legislative act or a legislative act is declared invalid, the source of its official publication must be indicated.
Examples:
(Vedomosti of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR, 1989, No. 1, p. 1)
(Vedomosti of the Congress of People's Deputies of the RSFSR and the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR, 1991, No. 1, p. 1)
(Vedomosti of the Congress of People's Deputies of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation, 1993, No. 1, p. 1)
(Sobraniye zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 1995, No. 1, Art. 1; 1996, No. 1, Art. 1; No. 2, Art. 35, 36)
33. The issue of the Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation may be published in two parts, for example: Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2001, No. 1, parts I and II.
Example:
(Sobraniye zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2001, No. 1, item 15).
34. If a legislative act is not published for any reason in the Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation or in the Gazette of the Congress of People's Deputies of the Russian Federation (RSFSR) and the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Federation (RSFSR), then "Parliamentary Newspaper" or " Rossiyskaya Gazeta" (in accordance with paragraph 35 of these Recommendations), which is drawn up as follows:
Example:
35. When publishing the text of a legislative act, which has a large volume, in several issues of "Parliamentskaya Gazeta" or "Rossiyskaya Gazeta", the dates of all issues of the newspapers in which the text of the legislative act was published are indicated as the official source of publication.
Example:
(Parliamentary newspaper, 1999, December 27, December 28)
(Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 1999, December 27, December 28)
36. When the same legislative act is published on the same day in Parlamentskaya Gazeta and Rossiyskaya Gazeta, it is recommended to indicate Rossiyskaya Gazeta as having a larger circulation as the official source of publication.
37. When making changes to the name of a legislative act, the following shall be indicated:
38. When amending a legislative act divided into parts, the following list of sources of official publication is indicated:
1) when adding a new part, making changes to the name of a part of a legislative act and presenting the part in a new edition, the following shall be indicated:
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act;
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act in the new version (if any);
2) when supplementing with a new section, making changes to the name of the section and presenting the section in a new edition, the following shall be indicated:
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act;
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act in the new version (if any);
- sources of official publication of all subsequent changes made to the part;
3) when supplementing with a new chapter, making changes to the title of the chapter and presenting the chapter in a new edition, the following shall be indicated:
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act;
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act in the new version (if any);
- the source of the official publication of the part in the new edition (if any);
4) when adding a new article, the following shall be indicated:
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act;
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act in the new version (if any);
- the source of the official publication of the part in the new edition (if any);
- the source of the official publication of the section in the new edition (if any);
39. When amending a legislative act divided into sections, the following list of sources of official publication is indicated:
1) when adding a new section, making changes to the name of the section and presenting the section in a new edition, the following shall be indicated:
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act;
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act in the new version (if any);
- sources of official publication of all subsequent changes made to the legislative act;
2) when supplementing with a new chapter, making changes to the title of the chapter and presenting the chapter in a new edition, the following shall be indicated:
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act;
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act in the new version (if any);
- the source of the official publication of the section in the new edition (if any);
- sources of official publication of all subsequent changes made to the section;
3) when adding a new article, the following shall be indicated:
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act;
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act in the new version (if any);
- the source of the official publication of the section in the new edition (if any);
- the source of the official publication of the chapter in the new edition (if any);
- sources of official publication of all subsequent changes made to the chapter.
40. When amending a legislative act divided into chapters, the following list of sources of official publication is indicated:
1) when supplementing with a new chapter, making changes to the title of the chapter and presenting the chapter in a new edition, the following shall be indicated:
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act;
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act in the new version (if any);
- sources of official publication of all subsequent changes made to the legislative act;
2) when supplementing with a new article, the following shall be indicated:
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act;
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act in the new version (if any);
- the source of the official publication of the chapter in the new edition (if any);
- sources of official publication of all subsequent changes made to the chapter.
41. When adding a new article to a legislative act, divided only into articles, the following shall be indicated:
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act;
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act in the new version (if any);
- sources of official publication of all subsequent changes made to the legislative act.
42. Regardless of the presence in the legislative act of such structural units as parts, sections, chapters, when making changes to the article and (or) to its name, including in the case of the presentation of the article and (or) its name in a new edition, the :
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act;
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act in the new version (if any);
- sources of official publication of all subsequent changes made to this article and (or) its title.
43. If in the name and text of the legislative act the word "RSFSR" was replaced by the words "Russian Federation", then without fail (in addition to the sources indicated in paragraphs 38 - 42 of these Guidelines) the source of the official publication of the legislative act by which the such a replacement.
44. If several changes are made to a legislative act at the same time in different structural units of this act, then the list of sources of official publication is compiled by absorbing a smaller list into a wider list.
45. When amending a legislative act that has been declared invalid from a date that has not yet come, along with all established sources of publication, the official source of publication of the legislative act that recognized this legislative act as invalid is also indicated.
46. When suspending a legislative act, the following sources of official publication are indicated:
1) when suspending the operation of a legislative act in full, as well as in an inseparable part (not separated into an independent structural unit), the following shall be indicated:
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act;
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act in the new version (if any);
- sources of official publication of all subsequent changes made to the legislative act;
2) when suspending the operation of a structural unit of a legislative act or its structural unit, the following shall be indicated in an inseparable part (not separated into an independent smaller structural unit):
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act;
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act in the new version (if any);
- sources of official publication of all subsequent changes made to the suspended structural unit of the legislative act.
47. When declaring a legislative act as invalid, the following sources of official publication are indicated:
1) when a legislative act or its structural units are recognized as invalid, the source of their official publication is indicated;
2) when a legislative act is declared invalid, the inseparable part (not separated into an independent structural unit) shall indicate:
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act;
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act in the new version (if any);
- sources of official publication of all subsequent changes made to the legislative act;
3) when recognizing as invalid not the entire legislative act, but its structural unit in an inseparable part (not separated into an independent smaller structural unit), the following shall be indicated:
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act;
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act in the new version (if any);
- the source of the official publication of the inseparable part of the structural unit of the legislative act in the new wording (if it existed);
- sources of official publication of all subsequent changes made to this structural unit;
4) upon recognizing as invalid a structural unit of a legislative act, which was absent in the initial version of the legislative act, but was supplemented later (when amendments were made to it), the list of sources of official publication of the legislative act must indicate:
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act;
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act, which supplemented this structural unit;
5) when recognizing as invalid a structural unit of a legislative act that entered into force before the approval of these Guidelines, if this structural unit was renumbered, the list of sources for the official publication of the legislative act must include:
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act;
- the source of the official publication of the legislative act by which this structural unit was renumbered.
AMENDMENTS TO LEGISLATIVE ACTS
48. In order to bring legislative acts in line with the newly adopted federal constitutional law or federal law, to eliminate the plurality of legal norms on the same issues, proposals are being prepared to bring the legislation in line with the newly adopted legislative act by amending the legislative acts.
49. Making changes is considered:
- replacement of words, numbers;
- exclusion of words, numbers, sentences;
- exclusion of structural units of a legislative act that has not entered into force;
- new version of the structural unit of the legislative act;
- addition of a structural unit of an article of a legislative act with new words, figures or sentences;
- addition of structural units of the legislative act;
- suspension of a legislative act or its structural units;
- extension of the validity of a legislative act or its structural units.
50. Changes may be made to the following types of legislative acts:
- laws of the RSFSR;
- codes of the RSFSR;
- laws of the Russian Federation;
- codes of the Russian Federation;
- federal laws.
51. Simultaneously with bills establishing new legal regulation, independent bills on legislative acts or their structural units subject to change should be submitted for consideration by the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. The presence in draft laws establishing new legal regulation of articles containing amendments to legislative acts or their structural units is not allowed.
The exceptions are bills on the federal budget for the corresponding year and bills on state non-budgetary funds, which allow the presence of articles on the suspension or extension of the validity of legislative acts or their structural units.
52. Amendments to legislative acts are formalized by an independent legislative act, in which, in turn, amendments to each legislative act are formalized by independent articles.
Example:
On Amendments to Article 5 of the Law of the Russian Federation "::::." and in the Federal Law ":::::."
Include in Article 5 of the Law of the Russian Federation dated::: No.: "::::::" (Bulletin of the Congress of People's Deputies of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation, 1993, No.:, Art.:.; Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2000 , no.:, art.:.) the following changes:
Include in the Federal Law dated::: No.: ":::::." (Sobraniye zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2002, No.:, Art.:.) the following changes:
53. In the event of simultaneous introduction of amendments to a legislative act and recognition of the structural units of this legislative act as invalid, the provisions on amendments and invalidation may be placed in one article. At the same time, the changes introduced and recognition as invalid must be stated sequentially (article by article).
Example:
Introduce the following amendments to the Federal Law dated::: No.: ":::" (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, : , No. :, Art.:; :, No. :, Art. :)
1) in Article 1 the words ":::" shall be replaced by the words ":::";
2) Part 1 of Article 2 shall be supplemented with the words ":::";
3) in clause 2 of part 2 of article 3 the words ":::" shall be deleted;
4) Article 4 shall be declared invalid;
5) Part 1 of Article 5 shall be stated as follows:
"1. :::::::: .";
6) in Article 6 the words ":::" shall be replaced by the words ":::".
54. When amending a legislative act, the type of act, the date of signing the act, its registration number (if any), its name, as well as the relevant sources of its official publication must be indicated.
Example:
Introduce the following amendments to Federal Law No. 173-FZ of December 17, 2001 "On Labor Pensions in the Russian Federation" (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2001, No. 52, Article 4920):
If the legislative act to be amended was completely reworded, then its details are indicated in the following sequence: type of legislative act, date of signing of the legislative act, its registration number (if any), name, and in parentheses indicate the type of legislative act, date signing and registration number of the legislative act, fully setting out this act in a new edition.
Example:
Include in Federal Law No. 3-FZ of May 8, 1994 "On the Status of a Member of the Federation Council and the Status of a Deputy of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation" (as amended by Federal Law No. 133-FZ of July 5, 1999) (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 1994, No. 2, article 74; 1999, No. 28, article 3466) the following changes:
If the legislative act to be amended was completely reworded and the type of the legislative act was changed (for example, the Law of the RSFSR became the Federal Law), then its details are indicated in the following sequence: the type of legislative act and its name, and in parentheses the type the legislative act, the date of signing and the registration number of the legislative act, which completely set out this act in a new edition.
Example:
Include in the Federal Law "On Banks and Banking" (as amended by the Federal Law of February 3, 1996 No. 17-FZ) (Bulletin of the Congress of People's Deputies of the RSFSR and the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR, 1990, No. 27, Article 357; Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation , 1996, No. 6, item 492) the following changes:
55. Regardless of the specific content of the bill, i.e. regardless of whether the text of the draft law contains the replacement of words, numbers, the exclusion of words, numbers or sentences, the exclusion of structural units of a legislative act that has not entered into force, a new edition of the structural unit of an article of a legislative act, the addition of a structural unit of an article of a legislative act with new words, numbers or sentences or the addition of structural units to a legislative act, the name of the legislative act always contains only the word "change" in the appropriate number and is drawn up as follows:
Examples:
On Amending the Law of the Russian Federation ":::::."
On Amendments to the Federal Law ":::::"
On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation in Connection with the Adoption of the Federal Law "::::::.."
The same rule applies to the first paragraph of each article if the article contains two or more changes:
Example:
Introduce the following amendments to the Federal Law dated::::.№::":::::.." (Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, :::, №:, art. :)
1) Article 1 shall be stated in the following wording:
":::::::::::::";
2) Part 1 of Article 2 shall be supplemented with the following sentence: ":::::::";
3) in Part 2 of Article 5 the words ":::::::.." shall be deleted.
56. When making changes to one or two (no more) articles of a legislative act, it is advisable to specify the name of the draft law.
Examples:
About modification of articles 5 and 10 of the Law of the Russian Federation "About militia"
On Amendments to Article 5 of the Law of the Russian Federation "::::." and Article 14 of the Federal Law ":::::."
57. Changes are always made only to the main legislative act.
It is unacceptable to amend the main legislative act by amending the legislative act amending it.
58. The introduction of legal norms of a temporary nature into the main legislative act is not allowed.
If it is necessary to establish temporary (different from the generally established) legal regulation on certain issues, an independent legislative act is adopted.
59. When amending legislative acts, the relevant text is enclosed in quotation marks.
60. Amendments to a legislative act must be stated sequentially (article by article) with an indication of the specific structural unit to which the amendments are made.
61. When amending codes consisting of several parts adopted by various legislative acts, it is mandatory to indicate the part of the code in which the changes are made.
Example:
Introduce the following amendments to part three of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2001, No. 49, Art. 4552):
62. When supplementing a legislative act with an article, chapter, section located at the junction of chapters, sections, parts, respectively, the exact location of the supplemented article, chapter, section is indicated with reference to the corresponding chapter, section, part of the legislative act.
Examples: (Chapter 1 has 14 articles)
Chapter 1 of the Federal Law dated:::: No.: "On:::::." (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, ::, No.:, Art. ::; ::, No.:, Art. ::) shall be supplemented with Article 141 as follows:
Chapter 2 of the Federal Law dated:::: No.: "On:::::." (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, ::, No.:, Art. ::; ::, No.:, Art. ::) shall be supplemented with Article 141 as follows:
63. Amendments in a generalized form to a legislative act (including the replacement of words and phrases using the wording "according to the text") are not allowed.
As a general rule, each change must be formalized separately, indicating the specific structural unit of the legislative act that is being changed.
An exception can only be the introduction of changes in a generalized form to one article of a legislative act or its structural unit. If no other changes are made to this article or its structural unit, and the replaced word or words are used everywhere in the same number and case, then such a change should be formalized as follows:
Examples:
In Article 10 of the Federal Law dated::::: No.: "О::::.." (Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, ... , No: , art. :) the words "::::" shall be replaced by the words ": :::".
Article 10 of the Federal Law dated:::::.. No: "On:::::." (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, :.., no: , art. :) after the words ":::::" add the words "::::..".
64. If in an article of a legislative act it is necessary to replace a word or words in several cases and the replaced word or words are used in different numbers and cases or in the same number, but in different cases, and other changes to this article or its structural unit are not included, the following wording applies:
Examples:
In Article 10 of the Federal Law dated::::: No.: "О::::.." (Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, ..., No.:, Art. :) the words ":: (words are indicated in the nominative case of the singular numbers)::" in the appropriate number and case, replace with the words "::(words are indicated in the nominative singular)::" in the appropriate number and case.
In Article 10 of the Federal Law dated::::: No.: "О::::.." (Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, ..., No.:, Art. :) the words ":: (words are indicated in the nominative case of the singular or plural)::" in the appropriate case, replace with the words "::(words are indicated in the nominative singular or plural)::" in the appropriate case.
65. When amending a legislative act, it is first indicated which structural unit is being changed, then the nature of the changes is indicated. Amendments to a legislative act should be drawn up starting with the smallest structural unit.
Examples:
Part 1 of Article 7 of the Federal Law dated:.:::.No. ::"О:::::." (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, ... , no: , art. :) supplement with the following sentence: "::::::.. ."
in subparagraph "c" of paragraph 2 of part 1 of Article 7 the words ":::::.." shall be replaced by the words ":::::::.."
66. When making additions to an article, part of an article, paragraph, subparagraph, paragraph, the words after which this addition should be placed are indicated.
Example:
Article 1 after the words ":::::.." shall be supplemented with the words ":::::.."
67. If the structural unit of an article of a legislative act is supplemented with words and this supplement must be placed at the end of this structural unit, the following wording shall apply:
Example:
Paragraph 1 of Article 1 shall be supplemented with the words ":::::"
In this case, the punctuation mark used at the end of the complemented structural unit is preserved without indicating it after the addition has been made.
68. The introduction of several changes to various structural units of an article of a legislative act is formalized as follows:
Example:
Include in the Federal Law dated:::: No.:. "O::::." (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, :, No. :, art. :) the following changes:
1) in article 2:
in Part 1 the words "::::.." shall be replaced by the words ":::::";
part 2 after the words "::::.." add the words ":::::";
Part 3 shall be supplemented with paragraph 7 of the following content:
Part 4 shall be supplemented with the following sentence: ":::::.";
2) the second sentence of paragraph 2 of paragraph 2 of Article 3 shall be deleted;
3) Article 4 shall be stated in the following wording:
"Article 4. ::::::
69. When supplementing an article of a legislative act with parts, paragraphs or subparagraphs that must be placed respectively at the end of the article, paragraph or subparagraph, the serial numbers of the parts, paragraphs or subparagraphs to be supplemented must be indicated without fail.
Examples:
Article 2 shall be supplemented with part 3 of the following content:
"3. ::::::.. .";
Part 5 of Article 6 shall be supplemented with paragraph 4 of the following content:
Paragraph 3 of Part 3 of Article 7 shall be supplemented with subparagraph 5 of the following content:
The replacement of the punctuation mark, which is necessary in a number of such cases, is carried out during the preparation of the current version of the legislative act (without a clause in the text of the bill).
70. In order to preserve the structure of the article:
1) paragraphs can be added only at the end of the corresponding structural unit;
2) if it is necessary to include a new paragraph between existing paragraphs, a new version of the structural unit of the article of the legislative act to which the paragraph refers is given;
3) when a paragraph is declared invalid, subsequent paragraphs are not recalculated. The invalidated paragraph is included in the count of paragraphs with subsequent changes to this structural unit.
71. A new wording of a legislative act as a whole is generally not allowed.
The legislator adopts a new legislative act with the simultaneous recognition of the previous legislative act as invalid in cases where:
- it is necessary to make amendments to the legislative act that require the revision of the legislative act on the merits and do not allow limiting oneself to a new edition of its individual structural units;
- it is necessary to make amendments to the legislative act affecting almost all of its structural units;
- only individual structural units of a legislative act retain their significance, and partially;
- it is necessary to amend the legislative act, recognized as invalid in its inseparable part.
72. The structural unit of the legislative act is set out in a new edition in cases where:
- it is necessary to make significant changes to this structural unit;
- the text of the structural unit of the legislative act was repeatedly amended.
73. The statement of the structural unit of the legislative act in a new version is not a basis for recognizing all intermediate versions of this structural unit as invalid.
74. If it is necessary to state one structural unit of a legislative act in a new edition, the following wording is applied:
Example:
Amend Article 16 of the Federal Law dated:::::.. No.: "O:::::" (Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, ::, No.:, Art. :) to amend it, setting it out as follows:
"Article 16. :::::::.
:::::::::::::..".
In this case, the name of the legislative act should be as follows:
On Amendments to Article 16 of the Federal Law "On:::.."
75. If it is necessary to make a change to the application, setting it out in a new edition, the text of the new edition of the application is included in the text of the amending legislative act, and is not an annex to it.
76. If it is necessary to replace the numerical designations, the term "numbers" is used, and not "numbers".
Example:
the figures "12, 14, 125" shall be replaced by the figures "13, 15, 126"
77. If it is necessary to replace words and numbers, the term "words" is used.
Example:
the words "50 times" shall be replaced by the words "100 times"
78. If a draft law, along with articles on amendments to legislative acts, contains an article with a list of legislative acts subject to recognition as invalid, then the presence of such an article must necessarily be reflected in the title of the draft law.
Example:
On Introducing Amendments to the Federal Law "::::" and Other Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation, and Recognizing Some Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation as Invalid
LIST OF LEGISLATIVE ACTS TO BE RECOGNIZED AS VOID
79. In order to bring legislative acts in line with the newly adopted federal constitutional law or federal law, to eliminate the plurality of norms on the same issues, proposals are being prepared to bring legislation into line with the newly adopted legislative act by recognizing legislative acts (their structural units) as invalid .
80. The list of legislative acts subject to recognition as invalid includes:
1) legislative acts subject to recognition as completely invalid. At the same time, separate positions indicate both the legislative act itself and all legislative acts by which changes were previously made to the text of the main legislative act.
Example:
Federal Law dated::: No.: "O::::." (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, ::., No.:, art. :)
2) legislative acts subject to recognition as invalid in part, i.e. if not the entire legislative act becomes invalid, but only its individual structural units (all numbered structural units of the legislative act, including paragraphs). At the same time, separate positions indicate both the structural unit of the legislative act itself and all legislative acts by which changes were previously made to the text of this structural unit.
Example:
Chapter 5 of the Federal Law dated: :: № : "О::::" (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, ::, № :, art. :)
3) in exceptional cases, legislative acts (or their structural units), which become invalid in an inseparable part (if it means a part that is not separated into an independent structural unit).
Examples:
Article 71 of Federal Law No. 42-FZ of March 26, 1998 "On the Federal Budget for 1998" (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 1998, No. 13, Art. Federation to centralized loans and accrued interest on them by borrowing organizations
Federal Law No. 37-FZ of January 2, 2000 "On People's Assessors of Federal Courts of General Jurisdiction in the Russian Federation" (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2000, No. 2, Art. 158), insofar as it relates to criminal proceedings
81. The following types of legislative acts may be declared invalid:
- laws of the RSFSR;
- codes of the RSFSR;
- resolutions of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR;
- resolutions of the Congresses of People's Deputies of the RSFSR;
- decrees of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR;
- resolutions of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR;
- laws of the Russian Federation;
- Fundamentals of the legislation of the Russian Federation;
- codes of the Russian Federation;
- resolutions of the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation;
- resolutions of the Congresses of People's Deputies of the Russian Federation;
- decrees of the Presidium of the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation;
- resolutions of the Presidium of the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation;
- federal constitutional laws;
- federal laws.
82. The list of legislative acts subject to recognition as invalid may be an independent article in a draft law establishing a new legal regulation, may be an independent article or articles in a draft law on amending legislative acts and recognizing certain legislative acts as invalid, and may also be independent bill.
Registration of the simultaneous introduction of amendments to the legislative act and the recognition as invalid of the structural units of the same legislative act is carried out in accordance with paragraph 53 of these Guidelines.
83. The list of legislative acts to be declared invalid must be legally justified and exhaustively complete so that not a single legislative act is omitted that is contrary to the new legislative act in connection with which this list is being compiled, and are not included for recognition as having lost the force of any legislative act or part thereof, retaining its value.
84. If a decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR, which was approved by law, ceases to be valid, then the list of legislative acts to be declared invalid shall include the decree and the law approving it (or part of it) as separate items. At the same time, separate positions in this list include legislative acts that introduced changes to the decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR.
85. If a law that was put into effect by a resolution of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR (Russian Federation) ceases to be valid, then the list of legislative acts subject to recognition as invalid shall include the law and the resolution on its entry into force as separate items.
At the same time, legislative acts that introduced amendments to the law are included in the list as separate items.
86. If the code ceases to be valid, then separate items in the list of legislative acts subject to recognition as invalid include the code itself, the law (or the resolution of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR, the resolution of the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Federation) on the introduction of the code into force or the law on the approval of the code.
At the same time, separate positions are included in the list of legislative acts that made changes to the code.
87. If a normative legal act of a state authority that does not currently exist (for example, decisions of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee and the Council of People's Commissars) is recognized as invalid, its recognition as invalid is carried out by that state authority whose competence, on the day such a need arises, includes resolving issues settled in a recognized normative legal act that has become invalid.
88. When including each legislative act in the list of legislative acts subject to recognition as invalid, the type of the legislative act, the date of its signing, registration number (if any), the name of the legislative act, as well as the source of its official publication must be indicated.
89. Recognition as invalid of legislative acts without recognizing as invalid in the form of separate positions of all legislative acts (their structural units), which at different times made changes to the main legislative act (for example, "recognize as invalid the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and all legislative acts, made changes to it") is not allowed.
90. Each legislative act is included in the list of legislative acts subject to recognition as invalid as a separate item. Legislative acts contained in such a list may be numbered sequentially (in this case, they are considered paragraphs and are numbered with an Arabic numeral with a closing parenthesis).
91. When declaring invalid the entire legislative act, the name of which has been changed, in the list of legislative acts subject to recognition as invalid, this legislative act is included with its original name and an indication of the source of its official publication. The legislative act that changed the name of the first legislative act is included in the list as a separate item, indicating its source of official publication.
When a structural unit of a legislative act whose name has been changed is declared invalid, the list of legislative acts subject to recognition as invalid shall be included with the changed name and with an indication of the original source of official publication, as well as the source of official publication of the legislative act that changed its name.
When an inseparable part of a legislative act, the name of which has been changed, is declared invalid, the list of legislative acts subject to recognition as invalid shall be included with the changed name and an indication of the original source of official publication, as well as the source of official publication of the legislative act that changed its name.
92. When a structural unit of a legislative act that was not in its original version (which was supplemented later) is recognized as invalid, the list of legislative acts subject to recognition as invalid shall include in the form of separate positions:
- this structural unit, indicating the original source of official publication and the source of official publication of the legislative act, with which this structural unit was supplemented;
- the structural unit of the legislative act, with which the structural unit that is no longer valid was supplemented, indicating the official source of its publication.
93. Legislative acts in the list of legislative acts subject to recognition as invalid are arranged in chronological order (by the date of their signing). Within the same signing date, legislative acts are arranged in accordance with their registration numbers in ascending order.
94. If it is necessary to establish in one list of legislative acts subject to recognition as invalid, different dates from which legislative acts are recognized as invalid, the list is divided into structural units formed in accordance with the corresponding date (term) of invalidation.
95. If one article or structural unit remains in a legislative act after the rest has become invalid, and it is subject to recognition as invalid, then it is necessary to recognize the entire legislative act as invalid, and not just this article or structural unit.
96. If a legislative act contains articles that invalidate previously issued legislative acts, then, if necessary, to recognize this legislative act as invalid, it is recognized as completely invalid, regardless of the presence of such articles in it.
97. The lists of legislative acts to be recognized as invalid should include not only legislative acts that were in force before the adoption of the new legislative act, but also legislative acts on this issue that were previously actually invalidated (i.e. are "FUSs") or absorbed by subsequent legislative acts, but were not recognized as invalid in the prescribed manner.
98. The lists of legislative acts subject to recognition as invalid shall not include legislative acts (norms) of a temporary nature, the validity of which has expired. Legislative acts (norms) of a temporary nature are included in the list of legislative acts subject to recognition as invalid only if their period of validity has not expired.
If the effect of a legislative act of a temporary nature or its structural unit was extended for an indefinite period, then the list includes both the main legislative act and the legislative act extending it.
99. If a clause to be declared invalid or an article to be declared invalid contains an indication of an annex, which, accordingly, must become invalid, then only this paragraph or this article is included in the list of legislative acts to be declared invalid, and the annex is not indicated separately, although it is also considered invalid.
100. If a paragraph or article of a legislative act, along with the approval of the annex, contains indications concerning other issues that retain their significance, and the annex is subject to recognition as invalid in full, then this paragraph or this article is included in the list of legislative acts to be recognized as invalid only in the part related to the application.
101. If the application cannot be recognized as completely invalid, then only the structural units of the application are included in the list of legislative acts subject to recognition as invalid.
Example:
Recognize as invalid point 2 of the annex, approved by the Decree of the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation dated::::: No.: "On::::" (Bulletin of the Congress of People's Deputies of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation, 1993, No.:, art. :)
102. If the legislative act has not yet entered into force, and the need for it has ceased, the term "revoke" is used.
103. In relation to the legislation of the USSR, the concept "is recognized as not valid on the territory of the Russian Federation" is used.
104. Draft laws establishing new legal regulation are drawn up in accordance with these Guidelines.
Legislative acts, which were prepared for consideration by the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation in accordance with these Guidelines, are also amended in accordance with these Guidelines.
Recognition as invalid of any structural units of such legislative acts or recognition of a legislative act as invalid is carried out in full in accordance with these Guidelines.
105. Legislative acts that were adopted prior to the approval of these Guidelines, but do not contradict them, are also subject to these Guidelines.
For example, the Methodological Recommendations will fully apply to the previously adopted federal law, in which the articles are divided into structural units, numbered in Arabic numerals with a dot, if there are no references in the text of this legislative act to what this structural unit (part or paragraph) is.
106. With regard to previously adopted legislative acts that do not fully meet the requirements of these Guidelines, they will be applied to the extent that it is permissible without changing or violating their form and content (for example, without taking into account the structure of the article developed by these Guidelines).
When referring to the structural units of existing legislative acts, making changes to them and recognizing the structural units of legislative acts as invalid, those designations of structural units that are already used in these legislative acts should be used.
107. The provisions specified in paragraph 106 of these Guidelines apply for the period of validity of legislative acts that were adopted prior to the approval of these Guidelines and do not meet their requirements.
This exception applies only to cases where it is impossible to apply the provisions of these Guidelines.
How to write correctly: in accordance or in accordance? You will find the answer to this question in this article.
general information
About how it is written: in accordance or in accordance, - not everyone knows. It should be noted that both presented lexical units have every right to exist. However, their use in writing depends entirely on the context in which they occur and what meaning is required. Indeed, although these words are very similar to each other, their spelling, as well as the meaning, differ significantly. And in order to avoid mistakes in choosing one or another ending, you should figure out which ones are appropriate to use.
What common?
Before understanding how to spell “in accordance”, it should be said that the lexical series “corresponding”, “corresponding” and “corresponding” have one common meaning, which expresses the relationship between something, consistency in certain characteristics, as well as coincidence in place, time or other features.
But before using this word in a sentence, one should take into account its individual and narrowly focused meaning. Moreover, in order to understand how to spell correctly: in accordance or in accordance, it is necessary to determine the part of speech to which these words belong.
adverbial preposition
Word ending in -and is an adverbial preposition, which is formed from the name of the noun "correspondence". As a rule, in a sentence such a lexical unit is used as a service part of speech. However, often in the text it retains an adverbial meaning.
So what will be correct: in accordance or in accordance? If this expression is used when it comes to any action that must completely coincide with certain requirements for decision-making, behavior, performance of certain functions, then only the first option should be used. Let's take an illustrative example:
- "In society, one should behave in accordance with the established rules of etiquette." In this sentence, you can ask the question “how?” to the word being checked. - in accordance with the established rules. That is, this is an adverbial preposition, at the end of which the letter “and” should be written.
- “The actions of the military were coordinated from the headquarters in accordance with the previously established order” (“how?” - in accordance with the previously established order).
- “She acted in accordance with the order that she was given back at headquarters” (“how?” - in accordance with that order).
- “Living in accordance with accepted norms is quite simple” (“how?” - in accordance with accepted norms).
- “The decision to go abroad was made in accordance with the opinion of all employees of the corporation” (“how?” - in accordance with the opinion).
In accordance or in accordance: how to write? If you are dealing with an adverbial preposition, then only the first option should be used.
Noun
“If you bring your desires into line with your capabilities, then you will never be in a difficult financial situation.” In this example, the word we are checking is a noun in the accusative case. Moreover, such an expression implies the need to bring something to a certain standard, to improve something that must fully comply with sustainable requirements.
Thus, the spelling of the letter “e” at the end of this word is explained by the fact that the noun in the accusative case coincides with the form of the nominative. It should also be noted that in a sentence such a lexical unit acts as a direct object.
Summing up
In line or in line? How to write this word correctly in a particular case, we found out. But to consolidate the material, we suggest repeating what is the difference between these lexical units:
- The lexical unit "to match" consists of a noun and a simple preposition. In a sentence, this word acts as an object. As for the expression ending in -and, then this is an adverbial preposition, which partially retained the adverbial meaning.
- If you need to bring something "in line" with a certain standard, then you need to use a noun with a preposition. In turn, an adverbial preposition ending in -and indicates the ratio of certain actions.
- The expression "in accordance" may include any additional word (in our case, it acts as a definition). Let's give an example: "bring to full compliance". As for the adverbial preposition "in accordance", this is an indivisible whole. It is impossible to introduce additional elements into such a service part of speech.